“What
are we doing to the forest of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we
are doing to ourselves and to one another”
– Mahatma Gandhi
Source: tipsforholiday
Summary
This paper explains the
crucial role of forests in India particularly. It starts from the colonial
period and tries to make us understand the importance of the protection of
forest cover and various rules and regulations related to the forest in India. As
per the state of forest report 2013, India was covered by less than 1/4th
of the forest or tree cover, whereas a minimum of 1/3rd is required
as per national forest policy for maintaining ecological stability. Forest are
very important for human survival as they are the lungs of the planet and hence
they needed to be protected.
The exploitation of forest land
During the colonial
period, the British exploited the forest resources of India to the maximum
extent. They formulated laws that could give them complete control over the
forest land, like Indian Forest Act 1878 for developmental purposes and sent it
to the industrial unit and especially for making weapons and into railways. The
following act and has snatched away the right of the tribal people who were
dependant upon the forest resources for their livelihood. And the 1927 Act undo
that injustice that happened.
India Forest Act 1927
categorised forest into:
1. Reserved forest: strictly under government
and activities are prohibited.
2. Protected forest: under the government and
several activities are prohibited
3. Village forest: under state government and
rights be given to village community.
For the reserved forest,
the government established a proper procedure that by the help of the “FSO”
Forest Settlement Officer any claim of right by local people over that forest
should be settled. This act also demonstrates the explosive intention through
various provisions for revenue generation. It also took the customary right of
forest dependant people as the state has an absolute monopoly over the forest.
Protection of forest land
Forest Conservation Act
(FCA) 1980, was the act which finally after long exploitation of forest helped
in forest protection. It helped in maintain the ecological balance and reduce
the commercial purpose of forest land. It had 2 main objectives:
1. Control over de-reservation of forest
2. Restriction of use over forest land for
non-forest purpose
FCA aim was to protect
and conserve the forest cover of India and the legislators did it by:
1. Restricting leasing of forest land to
private companies
2. Shifting power to control forest from
state to central government
FAC Forest Advisory
Committee was set up u/s 3 of FCA which give suggestion for doing any
commercial, developmental or any activity that would affect t the forest of
India through its research to the Central Government.
Role of
Judiciary in forest protection
Judiciary played an
important role in forest protection and expanding the meaning of the term
‘forest’ through passing various landmark judgements:
1. Anupam Minerals v Union of India,
1986: it laid down that word ‘conservation’ does not only mean preservation but
also afforestation.
2. TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v Union of
India, 1995: it did not provide a literal interpretation to the word ‘Forest’ and
says that forest also includes any land lays down in government record,
irrespective of private ownership. Ad-hoc CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation
Fund Management and Planning Authority), that is important though not been
operational which would help in more trees growth for any damage that happened
to the forest for the sake of development. CEC (Central Empowered Committee) is
entrusted with the power to decide to complain file by individual regarding
steps taken by government and Supreme Court get its help to decide case
matters.
3. Sushila Sawmill v State of Orissa,
1995: banning sawmills within 10 km of the forest land.
Conclusion
I had observed that
fundamental rights are not given supremacy over forest protection matters in
the court of law. Laws related to forests had gone a drastic shift in India.
And both government and the judiciary worked hand in hand for the development
of forest land.
0 Comments